IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_271
Label Language Type
Naturalness and Arbitrariness en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Object properties

Data properties

  • first page

    • 283

  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @article{Sider1996-SIDNAA,journal = {Philosophical Studies},abstract = {Peter Forrest and D.M. Armstrong have given an argument against a theory of naturalness proposed by David Lewis based on the fact that ordered pairs can be constructed from sets in any of a number of different ways.1. I think the argument is good, but requires a more thorough defense. Moreover, theargument has important consequences that have not been noticed. I introduce a version of Lewis's proposal in section one, and then in section two I present and defend my version of the argument. After addressing a worry about my argument in section three, in section four I argue that a similar ''argument from arbitrariness'' jeopardizes Lewis's solution to the Kripke/Wittgenstein puzzle of the content of thought.},author = {Theodore Sider},volume = {81},year = {1996},pages = {283--301},number = {2-3},title = {Naturalness and Arbitrariness}}@

  • has title

    • Naturalness and Arbitrariness

  • is published in

    • 1996

  • last page

    • 301