IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_438
Label Language Type
Persistent Propensities: Portrait of a Familiar Controversy en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Data properties

  • first page

    • 379
  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @article{Nordmann1990-NORPPP,year = {1990},journal = {Biology and Philosophy},title = {Persistent Propensities: Portrait of a Familiar Controversy},number = {4},volume = {5},abstract = {Susan Mills and John Beatty's propensity interpretation of fitness encountered very different philosophical criticisms by Alexander Rosenberg and Kenneth Waters. These criticisms and the rejoinders to them are both predictable and important. They are predictable as raisingkinds of issues typically associated with disposition concepts (this is established through a systematic review of the problems generated by Carnap's dispositional interpretation of all scientific terms). They are important as referring the resolution of these issues to the development of evolutionary biology. This historical approach to the propensity interpretation of fitness draws attention to the precarious relation between philosophical clarification of scientific concepts and any given state of the empirical arts.},author = {Alfred Nordmann},pages = {379--399}}@
  • has title

    • Persistent Propensities: Portrait of a Familiar Controversy
  • is published in

    • 1990
  • last page

    • 399