IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_140
Label Language Type
L'Argomento Dell'Uno Sui Molti. Il Dilemma Dello Struzzo en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Data properties

  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @article{CalemiForthcoming-CALLDS,author = {Francesco F. Calemi},abstract = {The purpose of this paper is to defend the so-called Ostrich Nominalism against the influential criticism that has been put forward by David M. Armstrong. First, I reconstruct Armstrong's ''One over Many'' argument for universals (\S\S 1-2), reviewing his main reasons for rejecting the foremost kinds of nominalism (\S 3). I then argue that Ostrich Nominalism has been underrated by Armstrong (\S 4) and that, consequently, his strategy for dealing with it results in misleading and elusive conclusions. I conclude that Ostrich Nominalism represents an arduous challenge to Armstrong's Realism in that it compels him either to give up his sparse Realism, or to acknowledge that all the solutions to the problem of universals are utterly meaningless (\S\S 5-6).},journal = {Rivista di Estetica},title = {L'Argomento Dell'Uno Sui Molti. Il Dilemma Dello Struzzo},year = {forthcoming}}@
  • has title

    • L'Argomento Dell'Uno Sui Molti. Il Dilemma Dello Struzzo