IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_1192
Label Language Type
Perceptual and Imaginative Conception: The Distinction Reid Missed en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Data properties

  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @incollection{FolescuForthcoming-FOLPAI,year = {forthcoming},title = {Perceptual and Imaginative Conception: The Distinction Reid Missed},author = {Marina Folescu},abstract = {The present investigation concerns Reid's explanation of how objects (be they real or nonexistent) are conceived. This paper shows that there is a deep-rooted tension in Reid's understanding of conception: although the type of conception employed in perception is closely related to the one employed in imagination, three fundamental features distinguish perceptual conception (as the former will be referred to throughout this paper) from imaginative conception (as the latter will be called henceforth). These features would have been ascribed by Reid himself to conception as involved in perception, but not to conception as involved in imagination. He should have recognized them as marking the former as a different kind from the latter, and he should not have hastily lumped perceptual and imaginative conceptions together.},editor = {Todd Buras Rebecca Copenhaver},booktitle = {Mind, Knowledge and Action: Essays in Honor of Reid's Tercentenary.}}@
  • has title

    • Perceptual and Imaginative Conception: The Distinction Reid Missed