Meta Ontology

first page

• 420

has Bibtex metadata

• @article{Gilmore2003-GILIDO-2,number = {3},year = {2003},title = {In Defence of Spatially Related Universals},journal = {Australasian Journal of Philosophy},pages = {420--428},volume = {81},abstract = {Immanent universals, being wholly present wherever they are instantiated, are capable of both multi-location and co-location. As a result, they can become involved in some bizarre situations, situations whose contradictory appearance cannot be dispelled by any of the relativizing maneuvers familiar to metaphysicials as solutions to the problem of change. Douglas Ehring takes this to be a fatal problem for immanent universals, but I do not. Although the old relativizing maneuvers don't solve the problem, I propose a new one that does. I spend half the paper defending the proposed solution against objections, and in the course of this task I touch upon such topics as backward time travel and the distinction between universals and particulars. I close by putting forward -- merely as an option -- a new way to draw the distinction in question.},author = {Cody Gilmore}}@

has title

• In Defence of Spatially Related Universals

is published in

• 2003

last page

• 428