@incollection{Zalta1989-ZALSPA,year = {1989},abstract = {The author resolves a conflict between Frege's view that thecognitive significance of coreferential names may be distinct andKaplan's view that since coreferential names have the same"character", they have the same cognitive significance. A distinctionis drawn between an expression's "character" and its "cognitivecharacter". The former yields the denotation of an expressionrelative to a context (and individual); the latter yields the abstractsense of an expression relative to a context (and individual). Thoughcoreferential names have the same character, they may have distinctcognitive characters. Propositions involving these abstract sensesplay an important role in explaining de dicto belief contexts.},publisher = {Oxford University Press},booktitle = {Themes from Kaplan},editor = {J. Almog and J. Perry and H. Wettstein},author = {Edward N. Zalta},title = {Singular Propositions, Abstract Constituents, and Propositional Attitudes},pages = {455--78}}@
has title
Singular Propositions, Abstract Constituents, and Propositional Attitudes