IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_1154
Label Language Type
Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Object properties

Data properties

  • first page

    • 182

  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @article{Pedroso2012-PEDEHA,number = {1},year = {2012},abstract = {de Queiroz (1995), Griffiths (1999) and LaPorte (2004) offer a new version of essentialism called "historical essentialism". According to this version of essentialism, relations of common ancestry are essential features of biological taxa. The main type of argument for this essentialism proposed by Griffiths (1999) and LaPorte (2004) is that the dominant school of classification, cladism, defines biological taxa in terms of common ancestry. The goal of this paper is to show that this argument for historical essentialism is unsatisfactory: cladism does not assume that relations of common ancestry are essential attributes of biological taxa. Therefore, historical essentialism is not justified by cladism.},pages = {182--190},title = {Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa},author = {Makmiller Pedroso},volume = {43},journal = {Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C}}@

  • has title

    • Essentialism, History, and Biological Taxa

  • is published in

    • 2012

  • last page

    • 190