IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_2086
Label Language Type
Propositionwise Judgment Aggregation: The General Case en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Object properties

Data properties

  • first page

    • 1067

  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @article{Dietrich2013-LISPJA-3,volume = {40},number = {4},abstract = {In the theory of judgment aggregation, it is known for which agendas of propositions it is possible to aggregate individual judgments into collective ones in accordance with the Arrow-inspired requirements of universal domain, collective rationality, unanimity preservation, non-dictatorship and propositionwise independence. But it is only partially known (e.g., only in the monotonic case) for which agendas it is possible to respect additional requirements, notably non-oligarchy, anonymity, no individual veto power, or implication preservation. We fully characterize the agendas for which there are such possibilities, thereby answering the most salient open questions about propositionwise judgment aggregation. Our results build on earlier results by Nehring and Puppe (2002), Nehring (2006), Dietrich and List (2007a) and Dokow and Holzman (2010a).},journal = {Social Choice and Welfare},year = {2013},title = {Propositionwise Judgment Aggregation: The General Case},pages = {1067--1095},author = {Franz Dietrich and Christian List}}@

  • has title

    • Propositionwise Judgment Aggregation: The General Case

  • is published in

    • 2013

  • last page

    • 1095