IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_2037
Label Language Type
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Object properties

Data properties

  • first page

    • 674

  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @article{Ereshefsky2010-EREWWW,volume = {77},journal = {Philosophy of Science},year = {2010},abstract = {The received view in the philosophy of biology is that biological taxa (species and higher taxa) do not have essences. Recently, some philosophers (Boyd, Devitt, Grifths, LaPorte, Okasha, and Wilson) have suggested new forms of biological essentialism. They argue that according to these new forms of essentialism, biological taxa do have essences. This article critically evaluates the new biological essentialism. This article's thesis is that the costs of adopting the new biological essentialism are many, yet the benets are none, so there is no compelling reason to resurrect essentialism concerning biological taxa},number = {5},pages = {674--685},title = {What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism},author = {Marc Ereshefsky}}@

  • has title

    • What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism

  • is published in

    • 2010

  • last page

    • 685