IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_1582
Label Language Type
Representing Subjects, Mind-Dependent Objects: Kant, Leibniz, and the Amphiboly en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Data properties

  • first page

    • 133
  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @article{Nunziante2009-NUNRSM,volume = {17},author = {Antonio-Maria Nunziante and Alberto Vanzo},title = {Representing Subjects, Mind-Dependent Objects: Kant, Leibniz, and the Amphiboly},pages = {133--151},abstract = {This paper compares Kant's and Leibniz's views on the relation between knowing subjects and known objects. Kant discusses Leibniz's philosophy in the `Amphiboly' section of the first Critique. According to Kant, Leibniz's main error is mistaking objects in space and time for mind-independent things in themselves, that is, for monads. The paper argues that, pace Kant, Leibniz regards objects in space and time as mind-dependent. A deeper divergence between the two philosophers concerns knowing subjects. For Leibniz, they are substances. For Kant, we cannot know whether they are substances. Kant conceives of knowing subjects as complex systems of cognitive capacities.},journal = {British Journal for the History of Philosophy},publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},number = {1},year = {2009}}@
  • has title

    • Representing Subjects, Mind-Dependent Objects: Kant, Leibniz, and the Amphiboly
  • is published in

    • 2009
  • last page

    • 151