IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_1793
Label Język Typ
Physical Necessity is Not Necessity $<$Em Class="a-Plus-Plus"$>$Tout Court$<$/Em$>$ en rdfs:label

Adnotacje

Identyczne obiekty

Typy

Data properties

  • jest opublikowany w roku

    • 2012
  • ma metadane w formacie Bibtex

    • @article{Masterton2012-MASPNI,volume = {13},title = {Physical Necessity is Not Necessity $<$Em Class="a-Plus-Plus"$>$Tout Court$<$/Em$>$},number = {2},abstract = {The very last of words of Naming and Necessity are `The third lecture suggests that a good deal of what contemporary philosophy regards as mere physical necessity is actually necessary tout court. The question how far this can be pushed is one I leave for further work.' Kripke (1980). To my knowledge he never conducted that further work; moreover, no one following him has wished to take up the baton either. Herein, I argue that in general, physical necessity is neither reducible to, nor implies, tout court necessity. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that even if Kripke's speculations are restricted to a subset of the physical necessities where it might be granted that all such are necessary tout court, physical necessity is still not reducible to tout court necessity},author = {George Masterton},journal = {Metaphysica},year = {2012},pages = {175--182}}@
  • ma tytuł

    • Physical Necessity is Not Necessity $<$Em Class="a-Plus-Plus"$>$Tout Court$<$/Em$>$
  • ostatnia strona

    • 182
  • pierwsza strona

    • 175