@article{Wahlberg2014-WAHTEC,pages = {463--482},year = {2014},volume = {24},number = {4},journal = {Axiomathes},abstract = {Several philosophers have maintained in recent years that the endurance/perdurance debate is merely verbal: these prima facie distinct theories of objects' persistence are in fact metaphysically equivalent, they claim. The present paper challenges this view. Three proposed translation schemes are examined; all are shown to be faulty. In the process, constructive reasons for regarding the debate as a substantive one are provided. It is also suggested that the theories may have differing practical implications},author = {Tobias Hansson Wahlberg},title = {The Endurance/Perdurance Controversy is No Storm in a Teacup}}@
ma tytuł
The Endurance/Perdurance Controversy is No Storm in a Teacup