IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_1012
Label Language Type
Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism en rdfs:label

Annotations

Same Individuals

Types

Data properties

  • first page

    • 191
  • has Bibtex metadata

    • @article{Okasha2002-OKADMS,volume = {131},journal = {Synthese},abstract = {Biologists and philosophers of biology typically regard essentialism about speciesas incompatible with modern Darwinian theory. Analytic metaphysicians such asKripke, Putnam and Wiggins, on the other hand, believe that their essentialist thesesare applicable to biological kinds. I explore this tension. I show that standard anti-essentialist considerations only show that species do not have intrinsic essential properties. I argue that while Putnam and Kripke do make assumptions that contradict received biological opinion, their model of natural kinds, suitably modified, is partially applicable to biological species. However, Wiggins'' thesis that organisms belong essentially to their species is untenable, given modern species concepts. I suggest that Putnam''s, Kripke''s and Wiggins'' errors stem from adopting an account of the point of scientific classification which implies that relationally-defined kinds are likely to be of little value, an account which is inapplicable to biology.},year = {2002},number = {2},pages = {191--213},author = {Samir Okasha},title = {Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism}}@
  • has title

    • Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism
  • is published in

    • 2002
  • last page

    • 213