IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_454
Label Język Typ
Why Hacking is Wrong About Human Kinds en rdfs:label

Adnotacje

Identyczne obiekty

Typy

Object properties

Data properties

  • jest opublikowany w roku

    • 2004

  • ma metadane w formacie Bibtex

    • @article{Cooper2004-COOWHI,title = {Why Hacking is Wrong About Human Kinds},author = {Rachel Cooper},pages = {73--85},number = {1},abstract = {is a term introduced by Ian Hacking to refer to the kinds of people---child abusers, pregnant teenagers, the unemployed---studied by the human sciences. Hacking argues that classifying and describing human kinds results in feedback, which alters the very kinds under study. This feedback results in human kinds having histories totally unlike those of natural kinds (such as gold, electrons and tigers), leading Hacking to conclude that human kinds are radically unlike natural kinds. Here I argue that Hacking's argument fails and that he has not demonstrated that human kinds cannot be natural kinds. Introduction Natural kinds Hacking's feedback mechanisms 3.1 Cultural feedback 3.2 Conceptual feedback.},year = {2004},journal = {British Journal for the Philosophy of Science},volume = {55}}@

  • ma tytuł

    • Why Hacking is Wrong About Human Kinds

  • ostatnia strona

    • 85

  • pierwsza strona

    • 73