@article{Kierland2007-KIEPAT,pages = {485--497},title = {Presentism and the Objection From Being-Supervenience},volume = {85},abstract = {In this paper, we show that presentism?the view that the way things are is the way things presently are?is not undermined by the objection from being-supervenience. This objection claims, roughly, that presentism has trouble accounting for the truth-value of past-tense claims. Our demonstration amounts to the articulation and defence of a novel version of presentism. This is brute past presentism, according to which the truth-value of past-tense claims is determined by the past understood as a fundamental aspect of reality different from things and how things are},author = {Brian Kierland and Bradley Monton},year = {2007},journal = {Australasian Journal of Philosophy},number = {3}}@
ma tytuł
Presentism and the Objection From Being-Supervenience