Meta Ontology

jest opublikowany w roku

• 2011

ma metadane w formacie Bibtex

• @article{Schroer2011-SCHCDP,abstract = {Sydney Shoemaker's "Subset Account" offers a new take on determinable properties and the realization relation as well as a defense of non-reductive physicalism from the problem of mental causation. At the heart of this account are the claims that (1) mental properties are determinable properties and (2) the causal powers that individuate a determinable property are a proper subset of the causal powers that individuate the determinates of that property. The second claim, however, has led to the accusation that the effects caused by the instantiation of a determinable property will also be caused by the instantiation of the determinates of that property\^a\texteuro''so instead of solving the problem of mental causation, the Subset Account ends up guaranteeing that the effects of mental properties (and all other types of determinable property) will be causally overdetermined! In this paper, I explore this objection. I argue that both sides in this debate have failed to engage the question at the heart of the objection: Given that both a determinable property and its determinates have the power to cause some effect (E), does it follow that both will actually cause E when the relevant conditions obtain? To make genuine progress towards answering this question, we need to take a serious look at the metaphysics of causation. With the debate properly reframed and issues about the metaphysics of causation front and center, I explore the question of whether the Subset Account is doomed to result in problematic causal overdetermination},author = {Robert Schroer},volume = {183},pages = {229--247},title = {Can Determinable Properties Earn Their Keep?},journal = {Synthese},number = {2},year = {2011}}@

ma tytuł

• Can Determinable Properties Earn Their Keep?

ostatnia strona

• 247

pierwsza strona

• 229