@article{Dyke2007-DYKTTF,year = {2007},journal = {Logique Et Analyse},author = {Heather Dyke},abstract = {There is a common approach to metaphysical disputes, which takes language as its starting point, and leads to a view about the range of acceptable metaphysical positions in any such dispute. I argue that this approach rests on accepting what I call the Strong Linguistic Thesis (SLT). In the metaphysical debate about time I argue that the new B-theory has rejected SLT, and for good reasons. The metaphysical debate about modality parallels the early metaphysical debate about time. I argue that a position analogous to the new B-theory of time is available in the modal debate, and has some advantages over its rivals.},volume = {199},title = {Tenseless/Non-Modal Truthmakers for Tensed/Modal Truths},pages = {269--287}}@
ma tytuł
Tenseless/Non-Modal Truthmakers for Tensed/Modal Truths