IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_578
Label Język Typ
Direct Reference and Singular Propositions en rdfs:label

Adnotacje

Identyczne obiekty

Typy

Data properties

  • jest opublikowany w roku

    • 2000
  • ma metadane w formacie Bibtex

    • @article{Davidson2000-DAVDRA,volume = {37},year = {2000},number = {3},journal = {American Philosophical Quarterly},abstract = {Most direct reference theorists about indexicals and proper names have adopted the thesis that singular propositions about physical objects are composed of physical objects and properties (and/or relations---I will use "properties" for brevity's sake).1 There have been a number of recent proponents of such a view, including Scott Soames, Nathan Salmon, John Perry, $<$span class='Hi'$>$Howard$<$/span$>$ Wettstein, and David Kaplan.2 Since Kaplan is the individual who (at least recently) is best known for holding such a view, let's call a proposition that is composed of objects and properties a K-proposition. In this paper, I will attempt to show that (given some fairly plausible assumptions) a direct reference view about the content of proper names and indexicals leads very naturally to the position that all singular propositions about physical objects are K-propositions.3 Then, I will attempt to show that this view of propositions is false. I will spend the bulk of the paper on this latter task. My goal in the paper, then, is to show that adopting the direct reference thesis comes at a cost (or for those who thought it already came at a cost because of (alleged) problems the view has with problems such as opacity and the significance of some identity statements; it comes at even more of a cost).},author = {Matthew Davidson},pages = {285--300},title = {Direct Reference and Singular Propositions}}@
  • ma tytuł

    • Direct Reference and Singular Propositions
  • ostatnia strona

    • 300
  • pierwsza strona

    • 285