IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_107
Label Język Typ
Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem en rdfs:label

Adnotacje

Identyczne obiekty

Typy

Data properties

  • jest opublikowany w roku

    • 2008
  • ma metadane w formacie Bibtex

    • @article{Leerhoff2008-LEEBRR,abstract = {In this paper, I will give a presentation of Bradley's two main arguments against the reality of relations. Whereas one of his arguments is highly specific to Bradley's metaphysical background, his famous regress argument seems to pose a serious threat not only for ontological pluralism, but especially for states of affairs as an ontological category. Amongst the proponents of states-of-affairs ontologies two groups can be distinguished: One group holds states of affairs to be complexes consisting of their particular and universal constituents alone, the other holds that there has to be a "unifying relation" of some sort to establish the unity of a given state of affairs. Bradley's regress is often conceived to be a compelling argument against the first and for the latter. I will argue that the latter approaches have no real advantage over the simpler theories---neither in the light of Bradley's regress nor in other respects.},volume = {1},number = {2},author = {Holger Leerhoff},year = {2008},title = {Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem},journal = {Studia Philosophica Estonica},pages = {249--264}}@
  • ma tytuł

    • Bradley's Regress, Russell's States of Affairs, and Some General Remarks on the Problem
  • ostatnia strona

    • 264
  • pierwsza strona

    • 249