IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_2037
Label Język Typ
What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism en rdfs:label

Adnotacje

Identyczne obiekty

Typy

Object properties

Data properties

  • jest opublikowany w roku

    • 2010

  • ma metadane w formacie Bibtex

    • @article{Ereshefsky2010-EREWWW,volume = {77},journal = {Philosophy of Science},year = {2010},abstract = {The received view in the philosophy of biology is that biological taxa (species and higher taxa) do not have essences. Recently, some philosophers (Boyd, Devitt, Grifths, LaPorte, Okasha, and Wilson) have suggested new forms of biological essentialism. They argue that according to these new forms of essentialism, biological taxa do have essences. This article critically evaluates the new biological essentialism. This article's thesis is that the costs of adopting the new biological essentialism are many, yet the benets are none, so there is no compelling reason to resurrect essentialism concerning biological taxa},number = {5},pages = {674--685},title = {What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism},author = {Marc Ereshefsky}}@

  • ma tytuł

    • What's Wrong with the New Biological Essentialism

  • ostatnia strona

    • 685

  • pierwsza strona

    • 674