IRI

http://www.metaontology.pl/metaontology_populated.owl#publication_200
Label Język Typ
There is No 'Truthmaker' Argument Against Nominalism en rdfs:label

Adnotacje

Identyczne obiekty

Typy

Data properties

  • jest opublikowany w roku

    • 1999
  • ma metadane w formacie Bibtex

    • @article{Parsons1999-PARTIN,author = {Josh Parsons},year = {1999},title = {There is No 'Truthmaker' Argument Against Nominalism},number = {3},abstract = {In his two recent books on ontology, Universals: an Opinionated Introduction, and A World of States of Affairs, David Armstrong gives a new argument against nominalism. That argument seems, on the face of it, to be similar to another argument that he used much earlier against Rylean behaviourism: the Truthmaker Argument, stemming from a certain plausible premise, the Truthmaker Principle. Other authors have traced the history of the truthmaker principle, its appearance in the work of Aristotle [10], Bradley [16], and even Husserl [15]. But that is not my task --- in this paper I argue that Armstrong's new argument is not logically analogous to the old, and, in particular, that it is quite possible to be a thoroughgoing nominalist, and hold a truthmaker principle},volume = {77},journal = {Australasian Journal of Philosophy},pages = {325--334}}@
  • ma tytuł

    • There is No 'Truthmaker' Argument Against Nominalism
  • ostatnia strona

    • 334
  • pierwsza strona

    • 325